What were some benefits of living in the New England colonies?

Sep 21, 2008 by performingstarr | Posted in History

What were some benefits of living in the New England (Northern) colonies?

Please lift
thanks =)

If you're talking about pre-American Coup d' British citizens living in the New England colonies as opposed to living on the frontier, some of the advantages would be access to finished goods (gear, clothing, and other finished goods), a more civilized lifestyle, a better chance of getting an education, not having to rise up for survival, access to potable water, and the availability of medicine and doctors, just to name a few things.

I am still undecided, and am not sure which candidate benefits me the most?

Nov 02, 2008 by Third Party Voter | Posted in Politics

My better half and I are both disabled, and we have 5 children ranging from 15 years to 4 months old. We are at the lowest level of the income scale (Under 15k per year), and we combustible in a small village in northern new england.

I don't want us to be starved anymore than we already are, but at the same time, I used to be "middle class" before becoming handicapped, so I do not call for the middle class hurt either.

So in reality, which candidate will help me the most, but not hurt the working force I used to be a part of?

Merely Me, if you are still undecided after two years of hearing these candidates, I don't think I can help you. Truth is, if either one wins and if they screw up, they can hurt us all.

What incentives would there be to Northern Ireland if it was apart of the Republic of Ireland?

Feb 03, 2009 by nyc2fla0127 | Posted in Other - Politics & Government

I'm beneficial this section is for both British and Irish citizens, so I can get to here the responses from both. To start out though, I'm an American (and not a stupid one lol), so I hold no impulse towards either argument.

What benefit could there be to people in Northern Ireland if northern Ireland were to become apart of Ireland? Realistically, I don't see this happening and it's in fact against the interests (especially economic interests) of the residents there, but for argument sake, how may it help them? This is why when I hear things about the ''IRA'', I compassionate of laugh a little. Here's some reasons why.

1) I'm not sure if this is true in all EU country's, but I'm sensible that it is in Britain. You're college education is completely pay for. Your taxes may be higher for it, but hey, I can tell you how much it sucks paying a commentator loan. I'm in a community college right now, barely being able to balance my part time Home Depot paychecks with it to elude getting a student loan. I don't know what the case is for Ireland, but if they don't fund college information (or fully), than this would be a disadvantage.

2) Lots of Northern Ireland residents would move to England's mainland, because they wouldn't want to give up their citizenship, nor get further a new one.

3) The whole basis of why radicals wanted Northern Ireland to be apart of Ireland has withered. Northern Ireland, which was actually historically Protestant, no longer dignifies itself by creed, but religion has become much less important in Europe over the past few decades. Although Ireland's no where near as Atheist as England, it's rising in Ireland and the creed just doesn't seem important anymore.

Besides religion getting less significant, it's probably even become more encouraging to permission Catholicism, because people, particularly those who are educated, show resentment towards the church. I doubt the pope reinstating a Holocaust-denying pope helped. Media portrayals with movies like ''Anxiety'' don't help much either. I was born Catholic, but don't associate myself with religion really, so I can tell you first offer distribute. So if religion was the base towards kinship, you'd have to think that had to contribute to the reason why the idea of this movement has died, or gotten less virulent if it minimally exists.

4) Would you rather run on the Pound or the Euro? Trust me, if you're British, and you leave England to another EU country, whether it be for business or idle, you're happy your currency is above their's. Who would want to give up that perk?

I think the reason why some people think the Northern Irish's angst about this is because they over they're getting screwed economically. That's apparently not the case though.

The question has floated out there about if they should or could become their own country too, but that's another (and more) intricate story.
I think this latest capitalist crisis really will go to show a couple things. One, it may be better off for a country to cage off immigration or to severely limit it in tough times. Unfortunately, if there's no enough jobs for everyone, than you shouldn't let outsiders in. Or if you do, it should only be in industries where shell help will always be necessary.

The reason why lots of EU country's take in immigration, even during tough times is to try to balance the low fertility count (which gets lower when people have less money). Sometimes though, a decreasing population stabalizes a population. At least temporarily. That would naturally adjourn workers, through more retirees than rookies.
I still don't see how religion could be of significance, because when they poll people in Ireland, and various European homeland's, the importance of religion just isn't there. Especially for Catholics, who seem to have the icing on the cake to resent.

Some people like to cutely accept in outdated movies that ''Italians'', ''Spanish'', ''Irish'' or ''Gleam'', or whoever else are devoted Catholics (never forget the word ''devoted''). Meanwhile, only 27 percent of Italy considers creed to be of significance, which is 3 percent lower than Canada, 6 percent lower than England and 32 percent lower than the Common States. I believe Ireland was also in like the 30's, but I'll have to double check.

Geographical preference does import though, to a certain degree. Still though, if you're in Northern Ireland, the fact you're an English citizenship would likely override other factors. Although it may be a calculate, I don't know if people will rely on WWI tidbits to decide their future.
The question to why poorer people in third times a deliver or developing country's have more children is complex, but a good one. For one, they have less access to birth control. Some people in early poorer parts of the world are more religious and sometimes are against using birth control for that reason. A trait you may have saw in the old world, and even sometimes in third delighted country's, is that they use the children for labor. Typically though, family's that use their children for labor tend not to have the tutelage or money to move to a modern world nation, whether that be England, Canada, America or which ever.

For what ever reason, this cultural aspect serves into the principles in poorer country's that it's better to have more children. People in the modern world are more concerned of expense. Many people in Japan, Spain or where ever solely can't afford to have more than one child, so they won't. Unfortunately, some also think this is a pretty ugly world, so why bring more children.
The authentic view is why things are the way they are today, but it's somewhat irrelevant to people's modern economic preferences and such. The governmental party's will do most of this judging. The vibe I've received from most Irish citizens was that it wasn't about Inclusive unity, because that's seeming to dissolve or just becoming less important. Similarly, many English people could care less for Protestanism.

People's interests in a democracy should be represented though, and for the most part, I about it's fair to say that they are. One thing about politics is it's impossible to keep everyone happy, but the idea is to make the most amount of people on top of the world. I don't really think the Irish government, nor Irish tax payers, who'd be responsible for paying for such a variation, or extra government employees, would be interested in such a deal. So there's an argument there's no winner in this scenario.
The UK may not be Atheist, and Atheism may not be as prevalent there as in France or Germany, but it's more common than in Ireland. And while Atheism may not be in more than 1/6 of the UK's citizens, it doesn't hint at religion is that significant. While there aren't necessarily an overwhelming amount of Atheists, yet at least, there are a number of people who are irreligous, who altogether have distaste for the idea of it for it's political nature. In Japan, France and other country's, that's specifically the case.
People in legitimate modern world country's don't necessarily always have poorer people who have more children, but sometimes, it can be occur. In Mexico's case, which is like in between modern and developing, their fertility is 2.4. But the poor parts, only near the U.S. border, are 3. The U.S. government wouldn't tell you this, but they see this as a perk, because it supplies to their increase in inhabitants.
By just letting them in, it saves hours of time, money and stress in paperwork for the process of immigration that has to be done for immigrants from all woods's besides Mexico.

It doesn't really make sense for the U.S. to allow such a high increase in folk, while their unemployment goes up, but I guess it's a risk they're willing to take. The low interest of joining their military, particularly since 9/11, has allowed the regime to want more citizens though to counterbalance that.
I never said the conflict in modern era was religion. I noted that religion played more of an smash a century or so ago. Nowadays though, that's not the case. And I wouldn't necessarily call it a ''conflict'' anymore. It's more like a partisan disagreement among the minority of a population. The violence has gone down tremendously. From time to time, you'll see people who take anomaly to it, but that's significantly died down.
I don't believe the island of Ireland should belong to Catholics, nor Protestants, but Irish citizens, regardless of what ever belief it's citizens practice or don't. Who the hell cares what religion people practice? lol Both Catholics and Protestants, who in point of fact practice, should be greatful if people even attend a Church period.

Well I'm from the Republic. I'll stock with your points one by one and then give my actual answer:

1: England's university education costs a fortune. Third level is far cheaper in the Republic. England is about £3000 a year and while our fees are common up next year they will still only be €1500 max for an undergraduate course.

2: People in the North of Ireland have dual citizenship and citizenship can't be changed like that. Take Hong Kong for instance. Most people there still have dual citizenship.

3: The situation in Ireland was never about religion it was simply Republican versus Loyalist and often this correlated with Inclusive versus Protestant but that was actually nothing to do with it.

4: The euro is currently more stable than the pound.

5: Northern Ireland are their own country, they have their own government. The UK is comprised of sort out countries.


Either way I think that the North can either stay in the UK or completely break off as its own country. Personally I don't think they could credulous economically without it. They cannot join with the Republic for a number of reasons.

1: The Republic cannot support them financially and it would cripple both countries.

2: That line of acion would reignite tensions and probably errupt in more fighting and quite frankly everyone is fed up of that.

Do you belong to the "new Church of Global Warming"?

Feb 05, 2007 by mano w | Posted in Politics

Nope!!!!!

People from the UK, tell me what you think of the EU, what are it's benefits and disadvantages?

Jul 25, 2007 by eorpach_agus_eireannach | Posted in Other - Politics & Government

When you fit say whether you are from England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland.

I fingers on from England.

My views of the EU are conflicted. When I was very young my father took me travelling in Europe and I can still remember the skylines of ruined cities, and visiting a young concentration camp, etc., and so I have a very deep emotional attachment to the fact that Europe no longer tears itself apart with urbane wars (the recent frightfulness in Yugoslavia excepted).

On the other hand, I can't help observing that the original materialization has long since disappeared, to be replaced by a bureaucracy that isn't accountable to anyone, that maybe does some good but its failings are much more remarkable, and that seems to be absorbed largely by controlling the terms of trade.

I also feel ashamed of the way that some of our politicians (Thatcher especially) went out of their way to provoke the rest of the community, so that they must regard us as unreliable - even before Blair chose to ignore them over Iraq.

Zehara Nachash at Dhat-Bhadan

Zehara performing a cane gambol followed by a drum solo at the North East Belly Dance Associations Belly Dance Benefit for the MSCPA.

The benefits of bedsharing

The listing honours the work of Prof's Helen Ball & James McKenna and looks at how bedsharing can help the indulge to deal with nighttime feeds ...